A Swede who lives in Finland and who is lost in Euroland - the wonderful world of Eurovision
There is always some matter to discuss or just a song I want to share
Very welcome - I hope you'll like it here!

Friday, April 13, 2012

Nul points: United Kingdom 2003

After Gunvor's defeat, it took another five years before anyone had to face the grim reality of ending with nul points in the protocol. But in Riga, one of the giants of the contest was to recieve a most concrete slap on the face by a united Euroland.

Arguably, the UK is the strongest competitor ever through eurovision history. They won five times, they were runner-up no less than fifteen times, and they produced more commercial hit singles than any other country in the running.

In the mid-90's, the BBC made a brave effort to keep the ESC alive by upscaling the national final, sending more modern and chart-friendly songs into a contest rapidly running out of steam. After hosting the 1998 contest however, the BBC commitment ebbed away and the UK entries became less and less spectacular.

And in 2003 it happened - what I had seen as completely unthinkable before - the UK ends in last place without a single point. The UK always used to attract some votes and attention and somehow managed to ride on their own reputation as the sole real pop nation of Europe.

With an entry like Jemini the last pieces of that reputation crumbled to dust. If the UK is such a pop nation, how can they cough up something like this? How can the nation of Beatles, Rolling Stones, Oasis and Dusty Springfield have themselves represented by people like these?

Nul points?

Yes. It was not the weakest song on offer in Riga (I still find this chorus pretty catchy) but there are different standards for different countries and Europe could no longer turn a blind eye to how the UK was treating their pop heritage.

In a way it stands out as the perfect end of an era. This was the last year of the old formula with no semi finals, new countries were emerging and the old giants had to struggle.

To have the biggest giant score zero looks almost like a monument and a farewell to the old times of Eurovision.

Jemini - Cry Baby (United Kingdom 2003)


  1. And of course the duo sang horribly out of tune. It might have been due to technical problems or something, but anyway the song was painful to listen. Why would anyone vote for that?

    But maybe if Finland had been taking part that year, we maybe would have awarded Gemini a point or two for quoting a Finnish Eurovisioni Classic from nine years before.

  2. Well, voice characterstics - zero, moves and stage presence - close to zero, lyrics - pretty much there, anything else to analyze?

  3. I find it's pretty catchy but the live vocal wasn't very good at all.

    When you think about it, 0 points doesn't mean that everyone hated it, it just means that it wasn't enough to be in the top 10 of any country. And from that point of view I suppose this did deserve 0. It just simply wasn't good enough to be in the top 10 of any country.

    But I still love it anyway.

  4. OMG! I'd clearly forgotton about this one - remember it well now - very poor performance for us - one of the worst from my personal memory of our UK entries.