I have been a big friend of this chosen concept for years already. As it has been hard to get big names to join in, why not have one big name do the job instead? Scrap the national final nobody wants to be a part of and find a star to send off to Eurovision.
The surprise here was more the fact that UMK 2018 seems to have been abandoned mid-season. There was already a call for songs and detailed information as how to send in entries. The call for entries opened and closed. What about the songs entered? Were they too few? Were the quality too low? Isn't it quite arrogant towards the people who actually bothered sending in their songs to Yle in the first place?
Saara Aalto was not a big surprise. People have been very fond of her - at the Yle and elsewhere - for years already and the buzz around her participation in the UK X Factor was enormous. She was the most googled person in Finland in 2016.
But is she a too obvious choice? She has a good voice and an impressive CV in many ways, but she is yet to have a commercial hit single. She hasn't released any material at all since her X Factor run and who remembers the runner-up of yesteryear anyway.
She also has an unfortunate track record of wanting too much. "No Fear" was a contender until a frantic and overloaded performance left the whole thing in ruins.
If there is somebody with a clear vision involved here, somebody knowing what a winning package could look like, then Finland could possibly go very far in Lisbon. I want to stay positive and believe the people in charge know what they are doing and that Saara can shine when needed.
What really should be done now is to drop the UMK brand. There is not a drop left of what UMK was originally intended to be and nothing in the 2018 selection process fits the description of previous editions. Retire the name and put the focus back onto Eurovision. No more blushing about it.
My reactions are quite similar to yours. First and foremost I am glad that YLE decided (really for the first time since they invited Lordi to take part) think out of the box and do something new to Finland but something that other countries have done with success. With one artist and limited number of songs we can really concentrate on the package.
ReplyDeleteSaara Aalto was quite predictable choice but in no means perfect. She is a showwoman and she proved in X Factor UK that she can handle big audiences and big extravaganzas. On the other hand we've yet to hear anything new from her, so far her biggest triumphs have been singin songs already known and proven blockbusters. So can she do it with a song that no-one has heard before? But if it wasn't Saara Aalto, who else could it be?
I think it comes down to two things. Number one, YLE and Saara must find a good song that does not just rely on her personality and her passion. A song she can do a relaxed (not overexcited) and professional performance with but which stands also as a good song by itself. With that team it shouldn't be impossible.
2. With a experienced show personality as Saara, Yle (+ Saaras entourage) must choose the right team and right concept to create a stage show that enhances the song, works for Saara but does not make a mess of the whole thing. Maybe they should give Rennie Mirro a call.
Only one artist and only three songs is also good idea as it saves the money for more important things. You don't have to create a fullblown stage show for 12 different songs, so there should be enough money left to make the three songs work perfectly and even some extra euros to enhance the song chosen for Lisbon with some stage and screen gimmicks that Finland has not so far been able or willing to use.
So with a 1. Good song, 2. Well planned, reheared and budgeted stage performance and 3. Saara doing the best she can do (and not overdo it) we might have a chance.